Current:Home > FinanceCalifornia bill to have humans drivers ride in autonomous trucks is vetoed by governor -RiskRadar
California bill to have humans drivers ride in autonomous trucks is vetoed by governor
View
Date:2025-04-18 12:31:22
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California Gov. Gavin Newsom has vetoed a bill to require human drivers on board self-driving trucks, a measure that union leaders and truck drivers said would save hundreds of thousands of jobs in the state.
The legislation vetoed Friday night would have banned self-driving trucks weighing more than 10,000 pounds (4,536 kilograms) — ranging from UPS delivery vans to massive big rigs — from operating on public roads unless a human driver is on board.
Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher, head of the California Labor Federation, said driverless trucks are dangerous and called Newsom’s veto shocking. She estimates that removing drivers would cost a quarter million jobs in the state.
“We will not sit by as bureaucrats side with tech companies, trading our safety and jobs for increased corporate profits. We will continue to fight to make sure that robots do not replace human drivers and that technology is not used to destroy good jobs,” Fletcher said in a statement late Friday.
In a statement announcing that he would not sign the bill, the Democratic governor said additional regulation of autonomous trucks was unnecessary because existing laws are sufficient.
Newsom pointed to 2012 legislation that allows the state Department of Motor Vehicles to work with the California Highway Patrol, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration “and others with relevant expertise to determine the regulations necessary for the safe operation of autonomous vehicles on public roads.”
Opponents of the bill argued self-driving cars that are already on the roads haven’t caused many serious accidents compared to cars driven by people. Businesses say self-driving trucks would help them transport products more efficiently.
Union leaders and drivers said the bill would have helped address concerns about safety and losing truck driving jobs to automation in the future.
The bill coasted through the Legislature with few lawmakers voting against it. It’s part of ongoing debates about the potential risks of self-driving vehicles and how workforces adapt to a new era as companies deploy technologies to do work traditionally done by humans.
Newsom, who typically enjoys strong support from labor, faced some pressure from within his administration not to sign it. His administration’s Office of Business and Economic Development says it would push companies making self-driving technologies to move out-of-state.
The veto comes as the debate over the future of autonomous vehicles heats up. In San Francisco, two robotaxi companies got approval last month from state regulators to operate in the city at all hours.
Last Tuesday in Sacramento, hundreds of truck drivers, union leaders and other supporters of the bill rallied at the state Capitol. Drivers chanted “sign that bill” as semi-trucks lined a street in front of the Capitol. There are about 200,000 commercial truck drivers in California, according to Teamsters officials.
veryGood! (53)
Related
- Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
- Jake Paul's fight vs. Nate Diaz: Prediction as oddsmakers predict mismatch
- Is mining the deep sea our ticket to green energy?: 5 Things podcast
- Veterans see historic expansion of benefits for toxic exposure as new law nears anniversary
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- NASA restores contact with Voyager 2 spacecraft after mistake led to weeks of silence
- LL COOL J on preparing to embark on his first arena tour in 30 years: I'm going to dig in the crates
- Judge partially blocks Texas abortion ban for medical emergencies, fatal diagnoses
- Selena Gomez engaged to Benny Blanco after 1 year together: 'Forever begins now'
- Hop in the minivan: 'Summer Is for Cousins' invites you on a family vacation
Ranking
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- History for Diana Taurasi: Mercury legend becomes first WNBA player to score 10,000 points
- You Won't Believe Which Celebrities Used to Be Roommates
- Heat and wildfires put southern Europe’s vital tourism earnings at risk
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- Rosenwald Schools helped educate Black students in segregated South. Could a national park follow?
- Prosecutors in Trump's N.Y. criminal case can have his E. Jean Carroll deposition, judge rules
- Season-ticket sellout shows Detroit Lions fans are on the hype train
Recommendation
Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
Crowd overwhelms New York City’s Union Square, tosses chairs, climbs on vehicles
Oregon, Washington getting Big Ten invitations, according to reports
'Regression to the mean' USWNT's recent struggles are no predictor of game vs. Sweden
Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
How long does it take for antibiotics to work? It depends, but a full course is required.
Chicago police shoot, critically wound man who opened fire on officers during foot chase
Every Time Rachel Bilson Delightfully Divulged TMI