Current:Home > reviewsNorth Carolina voter ID trial rescheduled again for spring in federal court -RiskRadar
North Carolina voter ID trial rescheduled again for spring in federal court
View
Date:2025-04-26 22:06:29
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — A federal lawsuit filed over five years ago challenging North Carolina’s new photo voter identification mandate is now set to go to trial in the spring, with an outcome that could possibly affect what people must do to cast ballots this fall.
The U.S. District Court in Winston-Salem announced on Monday that Judge Loretta Biggs will convene the nonjury trial starting May 6 over the law, which was implemented just last fall.
While the state’s photo ID requirement remains in place for the March 5 primary elections, a spring or summer ruling after the trial by Biggs to strike down the law could threaten its use in the November general election in the nation’s ninth-largest state. North Carolina will have races for governor, attorney general and many other statewide races on the fall ballots. Courts, however, can be cautious about changing voting rules close to an election to avoid confusion.
The May date is about three months later than the date that lawyers for the state NAACP and several local chapters had requested several months ago. They sued over the 2018 law claiming it is marred by racial bias.
Attorneys for Republican legislative leaders defending the law had told Biggs in writing that the trial schedule sought by the NAACP groups was deficient. They also said it allowed no opportunity for the judge to dismiss the case on arguments before going to a formal trial.
Biggs held a hearing in November about the trial date and whether the State Board of Elections should be required to provide more public records to the plaintiffs about how voter ID has been implemented since last year. In a separate order Monday, Biggs sent the plaintiff’s request to a magistrate judge to recommend a decision to her. That recommendation can be challenged.
After a state Supreme Court ruling last April upholding the 2018 law as legal, the photo ID mandate was carried out in mostly municipal elections in September, October and November.
The trial date order doesn’t estimate how long the trial will last. But it sets aside three weeks after the trial for the sides to file more papers.
The federal lawsuit alleges that the ID law violates the Voting Rights Act by discriminating disproportionately against Black and Latino voters to comply with the requirement. Republican lawmakers disagree and say the law builds public confidence in elections. They also point in part to a broader array of exceptions for people lacking an ID to still cast ballots when compared to an earlier voter ID law.
Previous trial dates for 2021 and 2022 were postponed. Biggs delayed one start date while the U.S. Supreme Court weighed her earlier refusal to allow GOP lawmakers to intervene in the case and defend the law in court. The U.S. justices sided with the legislative leaders in June 2022.
Biggs lifted her stay on action in the case last summer a few months after the state Supreme Court determined the mandate comported with state constitution.
In late 2019, Biggs issued a preliminary injunction blocking the 2018 voter ID law, saying it was tainted by racial bias largely because a previous voter ID law approved by legislators in 2013 had been struck down on similar grounds. The 2013 law was implemented briefly in 2016.
But the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed her decision, writing that Biggs had put so much emphasis on the past conduct of the General Assembly that “it was virtually impossible for it to pass a voter ID law that meets constitutional muster.”
veryGood! (5)
Related
- Romantasy reigns on spicy BookTok: Recommendations from the internet’s favorite genre
- Former Chiefs lineman Isaiah Buggs sentenced to hard labor in Alabama on animal cruelty charges
- Water Polo's official hype man Flavor Flav wants to see women win fourth gold
- Shaun White and Nina Dobrev’s Romance Takes Gold at The Paris Olympics
- Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
- Gymnast Levi Jung-Ruivivar Suffers Severe Allergic Reaction in Olympic Village
- Arkansas standoff ends with suspect dead after exchange of gunfire with law enforcement
- Why Prince Harry Won’t Bring Wife Meghan Markle Back to the U.K.
- Bodycam footage shows high
- Can Randy Arozarena save the free-falling Seattle Mariners?
Ranking
- Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
- Snoop Dogg carries Olympic torch ahead of Paris opening ceremony
- Sonya Massey 'needed a helping hand, not a bullet to the face,' attorney says
- Chipotle CEO addresses portion complaints spawned by viral 'Camera Trick' TikTok challenge
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Martin Indyk, former U.S. diplomat and author who devoted career to Middle East peace, dies at 73
- MLB trade deadline: Orioles land pitcher Zach Eflin in deal with AL East rival
- Senators call on Federal Trade Commission to investigate automakers’ sale of driving data to brokers
Recommendation
Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
A missing 12-year-old Georgia girl is found in Ohio after her community galvanized to locate her
The Ford Capri revives another iconic nameplate as a Volkswagen-based EV in Europe
Man gets 66 years in prison for stabbing two Indianapolis police officers who responded to 911 call
Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
This Mars rock could show evidence of life. Here's what Perseverance rover found.
Watching Simone Biles compete is a gift. Appreciate it at Paris Olympics while you can
Utah officials deny clemency for man set to be executed for 1998 killing of his girlfriend’s mother